>If Carlos actually
>Hit the car, or worse someone, rallying would have a serious
>problem on it's hands!
As horrible as that would be, it likely wouldn't be that big of a problem in real terms.
I'm not a lawyer, and I don't play one on TV, BUT I think the USA is one of the few places in the world where you can buy coffee with a REPUTATION for being too hot, spill it on our own lap, and successfully sue the company that you asked to give you the coffee. A decision that was clearly morally and fundamentally WRONG!
You have to remember that the Killer B's were banned, and so named, after going off into crowds and taking lives, that didn't stop rallying.
YES, safety is important and all measures should be taken to ensure the safety of the fans and the crews on a hot stage, but at some point people MUST take responsibilities for their own actions.
European rally fans KNOW what can happen and are familiar with the sport. With Sainz's accident, I wonder who bears the costs
- Physical damage to the WRC car
- Potential financial loss an emotional stress for Sainz if the crash costs him the championship
- Lost income to the organizers because SOME fans stay away, or ask for refunds because of cancelled stages?
The litigious nature of the United States is probably the single largest factor if they don't get a WRC round. Simply saying that you can 'get insurance' for the event is one of the reasons insurance is becoming so expensive!
That's enough ranting for now
Keith