Special Stage Forums banner
1 - 20 of 20 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
343 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
With the NASA aspect of sanctioning in the mix these days here are some questions I'm thinking of:

- Will they have a rulebook next year?

- Any hints if any current SCCA Nationals are going NASA? If NASA lets the organizers run the show and it's cheaper, why stay SCCA?

- Will there be NASA rally licenses?

- Any possibilities of NASA putting all these events together and running a Rally Championship?

Brian
 

· Registered
Joined
·
737 Posts
>- Any possibilities of NASA putting all these events
>together and running a Rally Championship?
>
>Brian

Wouldn't it be a better idea to have a Rally Championship that was independant of SCCA, NASA, whatever??

Skye Poier
Seattle, WA
 

· Four tree two remember Andrew
Joined
·
1,653 Posts
Having organized with them, I can answer a couple of these questions:

>- Will they have a rulebook next year?

They currently have a rulebook.

>- Will there be NASA rally licenses?

Yes, see Ray Hocker's response to some of the Gorman questions.

Wilson
 

· Registered
Joined
·
705 Posts
Wilson,

>
>They currently have a rulebook.

Yes, but by their rule book, my cage (and I'd bet nearly all other rally cages) is illegal since the cage goes through the firewall to the front shock towers. Maybe you could whip up a rally rulebook for them? ;)
 

· don't cut
Joined
·
4,838 Posts
Brian,
I just read the NASA 2003 Performance Rally Rules v.4.1 and see nothing about cage design. I do see two things that have caused weeping and wailing here and that is a ban on studded tires and the use of the red cross to stop the rally in case of non-rally traffic. What page covers cage design?
Richard
 

· Registered
Joined
·
512 Posts
RE: NASA's On Line Rule Book

Mmmmmm Co-driver reading material...

I would be nice if these where 'offical', but seeing as they are only available on an event's website and not an offical NASA website (no offence), I will consider them a 'guideline' more than a rulebook.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
512 Posts
RE: NASA's On Line Rule Book

>I just read the cover. Seems official. Maybe NASA doesn't
>want to put its rule books on line so that they can make
>money selling them. :)
>Richard

Let hope that doesn't follow us to NASA. :p

It does seem official enough, but most if not all of their other series rulebooks can be found online. It seems that the General Regs for Gorman where taken directly from this document, but it would be nice to see something offical (as far as a rulebook goes) before we get too many NASA rally's under our belt. right now there are a few things that refer to CRS which refers to SCCA, so these events are still being governed by SCCA policies.
 

· Four tree two remember Andrew
Joined
·
1,653 Posts
RE: NASA's On Line Rule Book

>>I just read the cover. Seems official. Maybe NASA doesn't
>>want to put its rule books on line so that they can make
>>money selling them. :)

Folks:

I would view them as "guidelines." They were put together many moons ago. They satisfied my need for a rulebook on short notice without offending other sanctioning bodies by taking theirs. I did change some things in the supp regs to account for some folks without licenses, but with prior motorsports experience, and some cage issues.

On another note, please observe that NASA is technology driven. You can currently register for any of their Road Racing events anywhere in the country from their website. All rules are available there as well (with the rally rules exception). Their rulebooks are not print or copy protected. I would expect to see the same for rally in the near future.

I must say, however, that I have experienced one SCCAesqe thing . . . I was sent two copies of my membership card. However, it is a nice multi-color credit card type thing, not two flimsy pieces that need to be joined together and laminated (which I've never done in my 7 years of SCCA membership). :p

Just my .02

Wilson
 
1 - 20 of 20 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top