>We have been advised by those creating the Stage Notes that
>it will be safer, for inexperienced tarmac drivers, to run
>on worn rally tires rather than tarmac tires.
I was thinking about this last night, and came up with more fuel for the fire:
You say it will be safer for INEXPERIENCED drivers. Well, how do you expect these drivers to get experience if they are never allowed to try it? It's a silly argument really. A driver doesn't know how to drive on tarmac, therefore he can't, but since he can't he'll never learn, and thus will never be able too. By that logic, we shouldn't let any seed 8 guys loose on the gravel either. After all, they are INEXPERIENCED. If you were really concerned with the safety of inexperienced drivers, you wouldn't let them start!
How many seed 8 guys are realistically gonna strap on a set of slicks to their open class WRX and pile into a tree? Have we had trouble with this on Brockway before?
I'm getting a little tired of "dumbing down" of rally to the lowest denominator. Yes, safety is important, and should always be the driving factor, but we must accept the fact that there is an inherent amount of risk involved. If you remove the risk you remove the basis of the sport and we all end up TSD rallying. Learning to rally is no different than learning any other skill. You have to explore the limits, push, and sometimes make mistakes in order to learn and get better. How do we expect people to learn to handle the many situations thrown at them in rally if we never let them try?
Dennis Martin
[email protected]
920-432-4845