RE: I don't understand....
>>>Can anyone name the 15 "teams" from 2002? Am I misreading
>>>these lines?
>
>Since, according to Ed Brennan's statistics, only 8 drivers
>ran all the events (not counting Pikes Peak), I find it very
>difficult to come up with 15.
>
>Adrian
I'm actually surprised the number 38 wasn't used. This is the number of "worthy" participants that ran at least 5 events.
If you look carefully at the ProRally statistics from 2001 to 2002, you will see that the number of entrants was DOWN, and the number of entrants that participated in X number of events was also down. Seems to me that the Resurgence of ProRally took a small step back in 2002. Could escalating costs have anything to do with it?
>>>Can anyone name the 15 "teams" from 2002? Am I misreading
>>>these lines?
>
>Since, according to Ed Brennan's statistics, only 8 drivers
>ran all the events (not counting Pikes Peak), I find it very
>difficult to come up with 15.
>
>Adrian
I'm actually surprised the number 38 wasn't used. This is the number of "worthy" participants that ran at least 5 events.
If you look carefully at the ProRally statistics from 2001 to 2002, you will see that the number of entrants was DOWN, and the number of entrants that participated in X number of events was also down. Seems to me that the Resurgence of ProRally took a small step back in 2002. Could escalating costs have anything to do with it?