>Hmmm,
>Here are my thoughts.
>From previous discussion I come to conclusion that double
>standards, protectionism and ?legal-illegality clearly exist
>inside your Rally Governing body.
yeah, and is present in most of the governing bodies around the world.
>Having ?Top Guns? on this continent definitively will help
>(or not) marketing this sport.
Most certainly, The Sport, not nessecarily our sport as the SCCA knows it...
>But you know?only one will
>get and this will open a Pandora box ? WHY NOT US?
Why not us, or why not THE US.???
Why not us? because we're not worthy. Sorry, I don't feel America is the propper place for WRC right now. Yeah, it would be great to see the heroes of rally, but I don't expect even 20,000 people to show, much less the hundreds of thousands that other places would bring.
Why not THE US? 2 words, Legal Liability. The lawyers have ruined this country (sorry Bruce
). You can't do a thing around here and not get sued. It's pathetic.
WHY NOT US (as said from a competitor)? Simple, because this is a world event, you can't be an Olympic Javelin thrower simply because you can throw a stick, and live in Salt Lake City... Don't fool yourself into thinking that many (any?) current SCCA competitor (with very few exception) will be ALLOWED to enter a WRC event.
>There is no question that many North America ?top ? drivers
>would like to participate in such events but?it could happen
>that the entry list would be closed?
as I expect it to be...
Just my 2.25CN (.02USD)
