If people are "just curious" then honestly, I don't have time for that. Because I already know that if any particular event "makes" $500, there a 100% chance that someone will post "Well, there were 25 entrants, and the event made 500 dollars, how come the entry fees weren't $20 less?" Then if an event "loses" $500, the response is "Well, that's just an investment for next year, right?"

And defending the line items gets ridiculous... "What, you paid $13 a head for the awards banquet? My brother knows a guy who could have done it for $11.50. You could have saved $375!" Yes, but the guy that WE used is the brother of the guy that helps us get road permissions. It basically comes down to there are generally good reasons for spending the money we do, but the time to explain it all and defend it online would take as much time as actually putting on an event!
So basically, if someone wants to come down and spend the time to LEARN about how rally budgets work, and understand the work that goes into the events, the financial risks taken by organizers... then I'm willing to show them the books to facilitate that learning. Posting everything on the internet just gets people all butt-hurt.
HyperFest. Yup, good news, while there's still expenses involved, it made money. Perhaps folks wonder where those free door backers come from every year, or maybe they don't. Perhaps people wonder why the NRS rally licenses still cost only $50 and not double or triple that... or maybe they don't. Or those nice digitally printed banners, like the one we had stolen at HyperFest, sure it's $100 for every banner, but, that's, like, comp'd, right?

Anyway, all the money goes into the pool of stuff that makes rally better, and pays for things like, umbrella girl outfits. (Did you know they get
more expensive the
less material they have???

) But the bottom line for HyperFest is that a bunch of people had two days of a good time for $150ish.
Not trying to stir the pot, but I do think that there is room for improvement in the structure of these events.
Everyone should know that Hollen has
already (prior to and unrelated to this conversation) contacted me and offered to help with events. So he totally isn't just pot stirring and actively is working toward improving the events and is absolutely genuine in his sincerity.
As soon as you see rally organizers rollin' up with their fur lined coats, there's a problem. Until then...
But back to the topic, WHERE prize money comes from is a pretty good question. Philosophically I'm against prize funds that are created by using entry fees. The guys that win are generally financially better off, and thus can generally afford better/faster cars, hence that's why they won, then the rest of the field. So you essentially have all the poorer racers giving money to the richer racers. (Please note my use of "generally" and richER and poorER. I'm sure there have been exceptions before and will be again in the future, and the richer and poorer are relative to each other, I'm not claiming that any particular racers is "rich" or "poor" in an absolute sense. The statement is a generalization.)
Prize money coming from somewhere else, naturally I'm fine with that.
Also on topic, I thought some of the NARRA events said they had $25,000 or $50,000 back in the day? I thought I remembered something like that from Buffum's book.
Cheers,
Anders